The System of Reparations in the Jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (Volume 392)
in The Hague Academy Collected Courses Online / Recueil des cours de l'Académie de La Haye en ligneSearch for other papers by Fabián Novak in
Current site
Google Scholar
(89,338 words)
ABSTRACTThe Inter-American Court of Human Rights has both contentious and advisory jurisdiction. In this course, Fabián Novak first presents a general overview of the Court tracing its origins to the idea formed at the Inter-American Conference on Problems of War and Peace, Chapultepec, February 1945. The author discusses the general aspects of reparations in international law in the context of the obligation to make reparations as a basic principle of the State in which the offense has been committed. He discusses the three main forms of reparation that can be used singly or in combination: restitution, satisfaction, and compensation. The author talks about the influence of judgments of the Inter-American Court on the domestic law of the United States. The International Criminal Court (ICC) has adopted some standards by the Inter-American Court, such as the notions of emotional and physical suffering. These examples evidence the positive influence of the Inter-American Court on the ICC.
La Cour interaméricaine des droits de l'homme a une compétence contentieuse et une compétence consultative. Dans ce cours, Fabián Novak présente d’abord un aperçu général de la Cour, en retraçant ses origines à l’idée formée lors de la Conférence interaméricaine sur les problèmes de la guerre et de la paix, Chapultepec, février 1945. L’auteur discute des aspects généraux de la réparation en droit international dans le contexte de l’obligation de réparation est un principe fondamental de l’État dans lequel l’infraction a été commise. Il discute des trois formes principales de réparation qui peuvent être utilisées isolément ou en combinaison: la restitution, la satisfaction et la compensation. L'auteur parle de l'influence des jugements de la Cour interaméricaine sur le droit interne des États-Unis. La Cour pénale internationale (CPI) a adopté certaines normes de la Cour interaméricaine, telles que les notions de souffrance émotionnelle et physique. Ces exemples montrent l’influence positive de la Cour interaméricaine sur la CPI.
Purchase
Purchase instant access for 1, 7 or 30 days on the home page of this publication.
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 40 | 40 | 8 |
| Full Text Views | 51 | 51 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 115 | 115 | 3 |
- ABSTRACT
- BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE
- PRINCIPAL PUBLICATIONS
- CHAPTER I - GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
- CHAPTER II - GENERAL ASPECTS OF REPARATION IN GENERAL INTERNATIONAL LAW AND IN THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
- CHAPTER III - MODALITIES OF REPARATION IN GENERAL INTERNATIONAL LAW AND IN THE CASE LAW OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
- CHAPTER IV - THE INFLUENCE OF THE SYSTEM OF REPARATIONS OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS ON AMERICAN DOMESTIC LAW AND IN OTHER MECHANISMS OF PROTECTION
- BIBLIOGRAPHY
The System of Reparations in the Jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (Volume 392)
in The Hague Academy Collected Courses Online / Recueil des cours de l'Académie de La Haye en ligneSearch for other papers by Fabián Novak in
Current site
Google Scholar
(89,338 words)