Competence-Competence in the Face of Illegality in Contracts and Arbitration Agreements (Volume 361)
in The Hague Academy Collected Courses Online / Recueil des cours de l'Académie de La Haye en ligneSearch for other papers by Richard Kreindler in
Current site
Google Scholar
(140,180 words)
ABSTRACTThe point of this lecture is to give a better understanding of illegality and its different forms in international law, as it can have different forms and exist in many circumstances. It is important to understand the context of private international law versus public international law, as public policy plays an important part in international arbitration. Moreover, the notion of the applicable law or laws is in International arbitration, whether it is commercial arbitration or investment arbitration is studied.Whilst the issues of corruption allegations, suspicions, findings and admissions are examined under the light of different contexts they appear, the Professor leads the class to the concept of jurisdictional limitations and illegality. This concept is linked to the burden and standard of proof, as well as the rights and duties of arbitrators. Finally, legal consequences of corruption are considered, so are the excuses for illegal conduct and the standards of review of arbitral awards existing in the corruption context.
RÉSUMÉDans ce cours, l’auteur aborde la question de compétence-compétence et de l’illégalité dans les contrats et les conventions d’arbitrage généreusement et de manière générale, de différentes façons. Il aborde ensuite les aspects de l’autorité potentielle du tribunal arbitral. Il s’agit de l’arbitrabilité, la séparabilité et la compétence. L’auteur examine l’illégalité en grande partie dans le cadre de la corruption et traite intentionnellement des manifestations importantes de l’illégalité telles que la fraude, y compris la fraude dans le factum et la fraude dans l’incitation, uniquement en passant et par comparaison. Il se penche également la corruption dans la sphère internationale. En outre, l’auteur compare et contraste l’arbitrage commercial international et l’investissement international et arbitrage international fondé sur un traité d’investissement. Il aborde également les défis conceptuels d’attribution et de la charge de la preuve. L’auteur explore les droits et devoirs de l’arbitre international dans le contexte des allégations de corruption, de soupçons et de résultats.
Purchase
Purchase instant access for 1, 7 or 30 days on the home page of this publication.
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 56 | 56 | 10 |
| Full Text Views | 56 | 56 | 5 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 120 | 120 | 9 |
- ABSTRACT
- RÉSUMÉ
- BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE
- PRINCIPAL PUBLICATIONS
- INTRODUCTION
- CHAPTER I - DEFINITION OF THE SUBJECT
- CHAPTER II - THE MEANING OF “ILLEGALITY”
- CHAPTER III - THE CONTEXT OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW VERSUS PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW
- CHAPTER IV - THE QUESTION OF THE APPLICABLE LAW OR LAWS
- CHAPTER V - CORRUPTION ALLEGATIONS, SUSPICIONS, FINDINGS AND ADMISSIONS
- CHAPTER VI - THE BURDEN OF PROOF AND THE STANDARD OF PROOF OF ILLEGALITY
- CHAPTER VII - ATTRIBUTION OF ILLEGAL ACTIONS AND KNOWLEDGE OF THE STATE
- CHAPTER VIII - THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF THE ARBITRATOR
- CHAPTER IX - LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF A FINDING OR ADMISSION OF CORRUPTION
- CHAPTER X - JUSTIFICATIONS, EXCUSES AND DEFENCES FOR ILLEGAL CONDUCT
- CHAPTER XI - STANDARDS OF REVIEW OF ARBITRAL AWARDS IN THE CORRUPTION CONTEXT
- BIBLIOGRAPHY
Competence-Competence in the Face of Illegality in Contracts and Arbitration Agreements (Volume 361)
in The Hague Academy Collected Courses Online / Recueil des cours de l'Académie de La Haye en ligneSearch for other papers by Richard Kreindler in
Current site
Google Scholar
(140,180 words)