(106,852 words)
ABSTRACTThe independence of international judges is the result of a particular synthesis of general principle of law imposing judicial independence, on one hand, and certain traditional rules specific to the status of the international arbitrator, on the other hand. Both the “weak” point and the “strong” point of the international judge reside in his nationality, a factor of ambiguous relationship between him and the State of his nationality, in particular with regard to his selection and appointment, as well as the renewal of his time limited mandate. The independence of the international judge affects his relationship with his peers and collaborators as well as the limits of his freedom of expression (the right to separate opinions).
L’indépendance des juges internationaux est le fruit d’une synthèse particulière du principe général de droit imposant l’indépendance judiciaire, d’une part, et de certaines règles traditionnelles propres au statut de l’arbitre international, d’autre part. Tant le point « faible » que le point « fort » du juge international réside dans sa nationalité, facteur de rapports ambigus entre lui et l’État de sa nationalité, notamment sur le plan de sa sélection et de sa nomination, ainsi que du renouvellement de son mandat limité dans le temps. L’indépendance du juge international affecte les rapports de celui-ci avec ses pairs et ses collaborateurs ainsi que les limites de sa liberté d’expression (le droit aux opinions séparées).
Purchase
Purchase instant access for 1, 7 or 30 days on the home page of this publication.
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 135 | 107 | 6 |
Full Text Views | 77 | 61 | 3 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 162 | 131 | 9 |
(106,852 words)